YogaCompare

Manduka PROlite vs Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm Yoga Mat Comparison

Manduka PROlite Yoga MatGaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm Yoga Mat
VS

Manduka PROlite

The Manduka PROlite yoga mat combines the renowned features of the PRO mat with a lighter design for on-the-go use. With 4.7mm of dense cushioning, it provides superior support and joint protection, while its textured surface and non-slip dot pattern ensure stability. The closed-cell PVC construction resists moisture and bacteria, making it easy to clean. OEKO-TEX certified, latex-free, and vegan-friendly, the PROlite is built for durability and backed by a lifetime guarantee.

MSRP: $112.00
Check price at AmazonOfficial website

Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm

The Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip yoga mat is built with a moisture-wicking top layer that gets grippier as you sweat, making it a good pick for hot yoga or higher-intensity flows. At 5mm thick with PVC construction, it's cushioned, durable, and easy to clean. It's also latex-free and free of common phthalates, with a lifetime guarantee that's hard to beat at this price.

MSRP: $69.98
Check price at AmazonOfficial website

Size Comparison

71"

Manduka PROlite

24"
68"

Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm

24"

Specifications

Manduka PROlite
Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm

MSRP
$112.00Check price at Amazon
MSRP
$69.98Check price at Amazon
Length
71" (180 cm)
Length
68" (172 cm)
Width
24" (61 cm)
Width
24" (61 cm)
Thickness

4.7 mm

Thickness

5 mm

Weight
4.6 lbs (2.1 kg)
Weight
4.25 lbs (1.93 kg)

Material
PVC
Material
PVC
Made in
Germany
Made in
-
Warranty
Lifetime
Warranty
Lifetime

Which Mat is Right for You?

Choosing the perfect yoga mat depends on your needs, preferences, and how you plan to use it. In this guide, we’ll compare the Manduka PROlite and Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm yoga mats, focusing on their key features, price, size, weight, and suitability for different users.

Price Comparison

Starting with price, the Manduka PROlite yoga mat is moderately more expensive with a suggested retail price of $112.00, while the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm yoga mat retails for $69.98. That's a noteworthy price difference of $42.02.

Size Comparison

When comparing the sizes of two yoga mats, such as the Manduka PROlite and the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm, it's essential to consider both the length and width of each mat, as well as their suitability for different types of practice. The Manduka PROlite measures 71 inches long by 24 inches wide, while the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm measures 68 inches long by 24 inches wide. Both mats are categorized as standard mats, making them ideal for most users and standard yoga sessions.

Weight Comparison

Weight is a key factor in choosing the right yoga mat, especially depending on where and how you plan to use it. The Manduka PROlite yoga mat is slightly heavier than the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm by a difference of 0.35 pounds. The Manduka PROlite weighs 4.6 pounds, while the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm weighs 4.25 pounds. Both mats are perfect for portability and frequent travel, making them a solid choice for anyone seeking an easy-to-carry mat for travel and on-the-go yoga.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Manduka PROlite or the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm cheaper?
The Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm is cheaper at $69.98, compared to $112.00 for the Manduka PROlite — a difference of $42.02.
Which is lighter, the Manduka PROlite or the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm?
The Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm is lighter at 4.25 lbs, versus 4.6 lbs for the Manduka PROlite.
Which is thicker, the Manduka PROlite or the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm?
The Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm is thicker at 5 mm, versus 4.7 mm for the Manduka PROlite.
Is the Manduka PROlite or the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm longer?
The Manduka PROlite is longer at 71″, versus 68″ for the Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm.
What are the Manduka PROlite and Gaiam Performance Dry-Grip 5mm yoga mats made of?
Both mats are made of PVC.

Related Comparisons

Browse all yoga mat comparisons →