YogaCompare

Manduka PRO Long vs JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" Yoga Mat Comparison

Manduka PRO Long Yoga MatJadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" Yoga Mat
VS

Manduka PRO Long

The Manduka PRO Long Yoga Mat offers 6mm ultra-dense cushioning and a fabric-like surface for excellent grip. With 14 extra inches of length, it's perfect for taller yogis. Featuring a non-slip bottom and closed-cell construction for stability and cleanliness, it’s eco-friendly, OEKO-TEX certified, and backed by a lifetime guarantee.

MSRP: $164.00
Check price at AmazonOfficial website

JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68"

The JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 updates the original Harmony with tougher natural rubber, improved grip, FSC and OEKO-TEX certifications, and production powered by renewable energy in Spain. Its open-cell 4.8mm surface provides strong dry and sweaty traction with moderate cushioning, and the mat is available in 68- and 74-inch lengths. Like other natural-rubber mats, it is relatively heavy, has an initial rubber scent, contains latex, and should be kept away from direct sunlight.

MSRP: $109.95
Official website

Size Comparison

85"

Manduka PRO Long

26"
68"

JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68"

24"

Specifications

Manduka PRO Long
JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68"

MSRP
$164.00Check price at Amazon
MSRP
$109.95
Length
85" (215 cm)
Length
68" (173 cm)
Width
26" (66 cm)
Width
24" (61 cm)
Thickness

6 mm

Thickness

4.8 mm

Weight
9.5 lbs (4.3 kg)
Weight
5 lbs (2.3 kg)

Material
PVC
Material
FSC-certified natural rubber
Made in
Germany
Made in
Spain
Warranty
Lifetime
Warranty
1 Year

Which Mat is Right for You?

Choosing the perfect yoga mat depends on your needs, preferences, and how you plan to use it. In this guide, we’ll compare the Manduka PRO Long and JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" yoga mats, focusing on their key features, price, size, weight, and suitability for different users.

Price Comparison

Starting with price, the Manduka PRO Long yoga mat is significantly more expensive with a suggested retail price of $164.00, while the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" yoga mat retails for $109.95. That's a substantial price difference of $54.05.

Size Comparison

When comparing the sizes of two yoga mats, such as the Manduka PRO Long and the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68", it's essential to consider both the length and width of each mat, as well as their suitability for different types of practice. The Manduka PRO Long is a long mat, measuring 85 inches long by 26 inches wide, which is suitable for taller users who need a little extra length. In contrast, the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" is a standard mat, measuring 68 inches long by 24 inches wide, making it ideal for most users and standard yoga sessions.

Weight Comparison

Weight is a key factor in choosing the right yoga mat, especially depending on where and how you plan to use it. The Manduka PRO Long yoga mat is significantly heavier than the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" by a difference of 4.5 pounds. The Manduka PRO Long weighs 9.5 pounds, while the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" weighs 5 pounds. Both mats are ideal for stability in a home or studio setting, making them a solid choice for anyone seeking a dependable mat for home practice or studio sessions.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Manduka PRO Long or the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" cheaper?
The JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" is cheaper at $109.95, compared to $164.00 for the Manduka PRO Long — a difference of $54.05.
Which is lighter, the Manduka PRO Long or the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68"?
The JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" is lighter at 5 lbs, versus 9.5 lbs for the Manduka PRO Long.
Which is thicker, the Manduka PRO Long or the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68"?
The Manduka PRO Long is thicker at 6 mm, versus 4.8 mm for the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68".
Is the Manduka PRO Long or the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" longer?
The Manduka PRO Long is longer at 85″, versus 68″ for the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68".
What are the Manduka PRO Long and JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" yoga mats made of?
The Manduka PRO Long is made of PVC, while the JadeYoga Harmony 2.0 68" is made of FSC-certified natural rubber.

Related Comparisons

Browse all yoga mat comparisons →